We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 January 15
SHIFT IN INTERNATIONAL COAL TRADE TO THE PACIFIC BASIN WILL CONTINUE - IMF
COALspot.com: The shift in international coal trade to the Pacific Basin will continue, IMF said in its latest Medium-Term Coal Market Report.
...
Wednesday, 21 January 15
MARKET INSIGHT - VASSILIS LOGOTHETIS, INTERMODAL
The World Bank has lowered its forecast for global growth in 2015 to 3% down from its previous level of 3.4% amid rising concerns over the economic ...
Wednesday, 21 January 15
THERMAL COAL PRICE OUTLOOK DEPENDENT ON INDIAN IMPORT DEMAND - MATTHEW BOYLE, CRU
COALspot.com: Supply and demand side developments in India will be an important determinant of future market dynamics and prices for thermal coal a ...
Wednesday, 21 January 15
PORT OF NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS JUMP 16.19% ON MONTH TO 15.80 MIL MT IN DECEMBER' 14
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped $1.136 billi ...
Tuesday, 20 January 15
INDIA TO SURPASS THE UNITED STATES AND BECOME THE SECOND-LARGEST COAL CONSUMER IN THE WORLD BY 2019 - IMF
COALspot.com: In 2013, coal added more primary energy than any other fuel and was the fastest-growing fossil fuel, enhancing its position as the se ...
|
|
|
Showing 3241 to 3245 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
|
| |
| |
|
