We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 30 January 15
CAN BULKER CONVERSIONS SPOIL THE TANKER MARKET'S PARTY? - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Oversupply of tonnage has always been in the back of the head of ship owners when it comes to taking advantage of favorable market conditions. As s ...
Thursday, 29 January 15
CHINA ENERGY DEMAND MUST BE REVIEWED DUE TO FUNDAMENTAL ECONOMIC CHANGES - WOOD MACKENZIE
New patterns emerging as energy demand growth decoupled significantly from GDP growth for the first time in 2014
Wood Mackenzie says 2014 was ...
Thursday, 29 January 15
CAPE MARKET IS STILL STRUGGLING WITH LOW DEMAND AND LOW COMMODITY PRICES
Handy
Supramax rates are heading south with slipping rates all across the block. USG activity is slow with mid-week levels in the mid 8.000s, Fea ...
Wednesday, 28 January 15
MARKET INSIGHT - STELIOS KOLLINTZAS
With most traders having returned to action from year end festivities, we have already seen signs of activity in the specialized product markets. L ...
Wednesday, 28 January 15
CAPES CONTINUED THEIR UPWARD MOVEMENT LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market displayed a mirror performance of that of the week prior, with the Capesize market correcting further upwards and ...
|
|
|
Showing 3226 to 3230 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Planning Commission, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The University of Queensland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
