We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 23 February 15
Q2' CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR Q2 ROSE 3.39% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 1.90 (+3.39%) per MT month over month and declined US$ 0.08  ...
Monday, 23 February 15
Q2' API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED $1 HIGHER THAN Q3
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 3.12 per MT (+6.44%) month over month and fall US$ 0.43 (-0.83%) w ...
Sunday, 22 February 15
THE BALTIC DRY INDEX LOST ALMOST 3.2% OR 17 POINTS WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Dry Index, one of the economic indicators that monitors the health of the world's economy by tracking the price of shi ...
Friday, 20 February 15
GOVT SET TO INCREASE COAL OUTPUT TARGET THIS YEAR - JAKARTA POST
The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry is planning to increase its coal output target this year as the government seeks to offset the ongoing de ...
Friday, 20 February 15
U.S. PRODUCED AROUND 19.2 MILLION SHORT TONS OF COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.2 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
|
|
|
Showing 3181 to 3185 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|