We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 01 March 15
BDI INDEX SLIGHTLY UP CAUSED AN INCREASE IN THE PANAMAX, SUPARAMAX AND HANDY SIZE INDICES
COALspot.com: The freight market saw some gains this week and BDI was up 5.26 pct closed at 540 points. However the Cape index failed to follow BDI ...
Friday, 27 February 15
WEEKLY US COAL PRODUCTION DOWN AN ESTIMATED 14.0% FROM LAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 16.5 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 26 February 15
DRY BULK MARKET COULD REBOUND FROM HISTORICAL LOWS IN THE COMING WEEKS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market could exit from its historical lows in the coming weeks, as Chinese buyers reenter the market after the holiday celebrations. T ...
Thursday, 26 February 15
COAL POLICY RISK: HIGHER ROYALTIES FOR IUP HOLDERS - BAHANA SECURITIES | JAKARTA POST
The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry plans to raise coal royalties charged to mining operation permit (IUP) holders by the end of the first qu ...
Thursday, 26 February 15
DRY BULK MARKET LOOKING FOR POSITIVE MOMENTUM, BUT PROSPECTS REMAIN DIM - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
As the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) inched a bit higher over the past couple of sessions and the Chinese are returning to the market after a week long hi ...
|
|
|
Showing 3171 to 3175 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The University of Queensland
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
|
| |
| |
|
