We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 19 February 15
PANAMAX: NOPAC AND AUSSIE ROUNDS ARE DONE IN LOW/MID $ 4000; TRIPS VIA INDONESIA TO INDIA CLOSER TO THE $5000 MARK - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The handy and supra market has not seen any firming rates in front of the Chinese New Year and still suffering on low activity in both hemi ...
Wednesday, 18 February 15
DRY BULK SHIPPING TO RECOVER IN LATE 2015 - DREWRY MARITIME RESEARCH
Strong trade growth, moderating fleet development and deployment of new fuel efficient vessels are expected to lead to a recovery in dry bulk shipp ...
Tuesday, 17 February 15
WHO PAYS THE SUEZ CANAL FEES? - INCE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
This was an appeal from an arbitration award on a point of construction in relation to the wording of an addendum to a ch ...
Tuesday, 17 February 15
BUOYANT WAVES IN RECENT YEARS: GLOBAL SHIP INVESTMENT SINCE THE CRASH - HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Anxiety about fleet expansion is a recurring feature of world shipping markets. Within the global maritime community, worries about the vast amount ...
Tuesday, 17 February 15
FOB SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP UP 8% MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q2' 2015 rose week over week and month on month.
The Q2 swap up US$ 3.58 (+8.00%) month o ...
|
|
|
Showing 3186 to 3190 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
