We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 19 March 15
INDONESIAN COAL BENCHMARK SOAR 7.69% IN MARCH....!!!
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia revised up Indonesian coal benchmark prices to US$ 67.76 per MT in March ...
Wednesday, 18 March 15
AVERAGE RATE FOR CAPES MOVED TO BELOW $ 4K/DAY LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The even heavier losses noted in the Capesize segment last week, denied the Dry Bulk market a third weekly positive, while the smalle ...
Wednesday, 18 March 15
PARKING THE CAPES - LINOS KOGEVINAS
It is no secret that recent times have been anything but kind towards shipping, and no sector has suffered more lately than the dry bulk one. While ...
Wednesday, 18 March 15
CHINA-OWNED SHIPS: A RAPID RISE TO BECOME ONE OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST FLEETS - RICHARD SCOTT
Ships operated by owners based in China have become increasingly prominent on the world’s sea routes. China-owned container ships, bulk carri ...
Wednesday, 18 March 15
Q2 INDONESIAN COAL SWAP DROP 1.45% M-O-M; GAIN 0.63% W-O-W
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q2' 2015 drop month on month and gained week over week.
The Q2 swap fell US$ 0.70 (1.45%) ...
|
|
|
Showing 3126 to 3130 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
