We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 March 15
GAS TO CHALLENGE COAL IN THE ASIAN POWER GENERATION MIX - WOOD MACKENZIE
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Wood Mackenzie says that coal is facing increasing competition from gas in the power sector. Coal has dominated as the fu ...
Tuesday, 17 March 15
RIO TINTO PAID US$ 7.1 BILLION IN TAXES IN 2014
COALspot.com: Rio Tinto has published its latest Taxes paid report, detailing the US$7.1 billion in taxes paid by the company around the world in 2 ...
Tuesday, 17 March 15
NEARLY 17% OF US COAL PRODUCTION UNECONOMIC AT CURRENT MARKET PRICING - WOOD MACKENZIE
COALspot.com: Close to 17% of forecast 2015 US coal production is at risk of idling or closure, totalling 162 million short tons (Mst), as these mi ...
Tuesday, 17 March 15
Q3' SA COAL SWAP CLOSED $57.30 PMT W/E 13 MARCH
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 declined month over month and gained week on week.
The Q2 swap has fe ...
Monday, 16 March 15
MAKING THE WORLD GO ROUND - SEABORNE TRADE! - CLARKSONS
Money, or even love if you prefer, are claimed to make the world go round. For the shipping world, however, it’s trade that sets things spinn ...
|
|
|
Showing 3131 to 3135 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PTC India Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
|
| |
| |
|
