We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 24 March 15
RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FOR DELIVERY Q2 CLOSED $ 1.87 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q3 CLOSING PRICE
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 declined month over month and week on week.
The Q2 swap has dropped U ...
Tuesday, 24 March 15
ARGUS MEDITERRANEAN SOLID FUELS 2015 CONFERENCE | 2-3 JUNE, ISTANBUL
Press Release: Argus Media is proud to announce Argus Mediterranean Solid Fuels, which will be held in Istanbul,on 2-3February.
Argus produces ...
Monday, 23 March 15
IS OIL GETTING READY TO PLUNGE BELOW $40? - FORBES
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In my last crude oil market update in late-February, I expressed my skepticism toward the oil price rebound. Since then, ...
Monday, 23 March 15
Q4' 2015 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS DECLINED 6.79% M-O-M; 2.55% W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 3.42 per MT (-6.33%) month over month and US$ 1.37 (-2.77%) we ...
Monday, 23 March 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP: Q3 DELIVERY HAS FALLEN 7.93% MONTH-ON-MONTH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 4.09 (-7.06%) per MT month over month and US$ 2.00 (-3 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3116 to 3120 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PTC India Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Planning Commission, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
|
| |
| |
|
