We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 27 March 15
INDONESIA: NEW REGULATION REQUIRES LETTER OF CREDIT FOR EXPORT OF PRODUCTS FROM NATURAL RESOURCES
The Minister of Trade issued Ministerial Regulation No. 04/M-DAG/PER/1/2015 (“Regulation No. 4/2015”) on 5 January 2015. Regulati ...
Friday, 27 March 15
WEEKLY U.S COAL OUTPUT FALLS 1.7% W-W; 7.9% Y-Y
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately totaled an estimated 18.2 million ...
Thursday, 26 March 15
CHINA IRON ORE IMPORT FOR THE FIRST 2 MONTHS DECLINED BY 1.2 % Y-O-Y; PANAMAX AUSSIE/CHINA ROUNDS BEING FIXED IN THE $4 -5K RANGE - FEARNLEYS
Handy
There has been more activity in both hemispheres this week. Especially the USG market has picked up with more cargoes for prompter dates en ...
Thursday, 26 March 15
RATES FOR THE SMALLER SIZE SEGMENT CONTINUED TO IMPROVE LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
To see green across the board is a rare occurrence in the Dry Bulk market nowadays and while the upside in which last week closed off is not of the ...
Thursday, 26 March 15
KYUSHU ELECTRIC POWER OF JAPAN HAS JOINED GLOBALCOAL ONLINE COAL TRADING PLATFORM
globalCOAL® announced today that Kyushu Electric Power, one of Japan’s largest utility companies, has joined its online coal trading plat ...
|
|
|
Showing 3106 to 3110 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- MS Steel International - UAE
|
| |
| |
|