We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 01 April 15
SUPRAMAX & HANDY: RATES HELD STEADY TOWARDS THE WEEKEND
“Despite the fact that the Dry Bulk market closed off on the green last week, sentiment didn't improve by any means, not only because of ...
Wednesday, 01 April 15
WEEKLY SHIPPING MARKET UPDATE - INTERMODAL
There is no doubt that we are still witnessing a very challenging and at the same time very uncertain market, both with respect to dry chartering a ...
Wednesday, 01 April 15
Q4' 15 INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $45.15 W/E 27 MARCH 2015
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 drops month on month and week over week.
The Q2 swap declined US$ 1.54 (3.24%) mo ...
Tuesday, 31 March 15
RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS GAIN WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 declined month over month but increased week on week.
The Q2 swap has ...
Monday, 30 March 15
WORST IS OVER FOR THE DRY BULK MARKET, BUT THE PAIN WILL REMAIN FOR YEARS TO COME, SAYS BIMCO CHIEF ANALYST - HELLENIC SHIPPING
The current demise of the dry bulk market isn’t one to go away anytime soon. That doesn’t mean that it can’t improve, with all sh ...
|
|
|
Showing 3096 to 3100 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
