We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 04 April 15
BORYEONG POWER OF KOMIPO TO BUY TOTALED 695K MT OF HIGH AND LCV COAL
COALspot.com - Korea Midland Power Co. Ltd. (KOMIPO) is inviting bids from coal producers, marketing companies, or traders to supply of 500000 Metr ...
Friday, 03 April 15
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION STAYS FLAT
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 18.3 million short ...
Friday, 03 April 15
TOBA BARA'S PANDU SJAHRIR ELECTED AS NEW CHAIRMAN OF THE INDONESIAN COAL MINING ASSOCIATION
COALspot.com: Pandu Sjahrir, the Vice President Director & CFO of the Jakarta-listed PT Toba Bara Sejahtra — a subsidiary of PT Toba Seja ...
Thursday, 02 April 15
GOVERNMENT MUST WORK WITH MINING, NOT AGAINST IT - PANDU SJAHRIR
The Coal Face: The coal price has hit its lowest point in recent memory
My father used to say to me that his children are his biggest inv ...
Thursday, 02 April 15
NEWBUILDING ORDERS FOR DRY BULK CARRIERS "DRY" UP
Newbuilding ordering activity remained subdued over the course of the past week, as ship owners are wary of adding further tonnage to an already pr ...
|
|
|
Showing 3091 to 3095 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|