We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 10 April 15
DRY BULK MARKET'S DOWNFALL ALSO OFFER INVESTMENT BARGAINS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Dry bulk market rates have fallen to historical lows over the past few weeks, with no clear path of recovery, at least in the near term. As such, m ...
Thursday, 09 April 15
CAPESIZE: RATES ARE STILL DISAPPOINTING - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The handy market had a stronger sentiment before the Easter holidays, but have as the bigger panamaxes seen a softening tendency this week. ...
Wednesday, 08 April 15
DRY BULK MARKET SEEMS UNABLE TO CATCH A BREAK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market seems unable to catch a break these days.
According to Intermodal, following the market stabilization that p ...
Wednesday, 08 April 15
CHINA BURNS HALF OF THE WORLD'S COAL - CHRISTOPHER T. WHITTY
Intermodal Weekly Market Update
China is the world's largest consumer of coal, using more coal each year than the United States, the Europ ...
Tuesday, 07 April 15
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP KEEPS DROPPING; DROPPED 2% W-W
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q2 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q2 swap was declined US$ 2.44 (5.14%) ...
|
|
|
Showing 3081 to 3085 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Australian Coal Association
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Planning Commission, India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PTC India Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
