We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 26 August 15
2Q'16 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FALLS NEARLY 4.76 PER CENT M-O-M
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was declined $ 2.20 (-5.13%) p ...
Tuesday, 25 August 15
INDONESIA MINERS' NPLS TO RISE FURTHER, BANK RISKS BUILD - FITCH
The NPLs of Indonesian mine and mine services companies are likely to rise further in the short term, says Fitch Ratings, after reaching multi-year ...
Tuesday, 25 August 15
MINER'S EARNINGS DROP ON FALLING COAL PRICES; Q2'16 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 52.23 A TON
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery 4Q' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was down US$ ...
Monday, 24 August 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS HIT FRESH LOW, DIPPING BELOW $42 A TON
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down $ 2.20 per MT (-5.01%) month over month to US$ 41.70 per mt. The swap ...
Monday, 24 August 15
Q1'16 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 48.65 PMT
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined just US$ 1.89 (3.74%) per MT month over month.
A commodity ...
|
|
|
Showing 2851 to 2855 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Planning Commission, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PTC India Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Coal Association
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|