We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 09 September 15
FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP LOSE GROUND ON SLOWING DEMAND
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The 4Q swap declined $ 1.92 (-4.52%) per t ...
Tuesday, 08 September 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS CONTINUE TO SHOW DECLINING TREND
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery 4Q' 2015 declined week over week and month over month.
The 4Q swap was down US$ ...
Tuesday, 08 September 15
GANGAVARAM PORT IN INDIA DISCHARGES RECORD 112,599 MT OF STEAM COAL IN 24 HOURS
COALspot.com: Gangavaram Port, an all weather, multipurpose port with water depth up-to 21 meters, capable of handling fully laden Super Cap ...
Monday, 07 September 15
THE MINE OF THE FUTURE WILL HAVE ONLY TWO EMPLOYEES, A MAN AND A DOG - SCOTT MCGOWAN
"The Technology and Innovation in Mining 2015" production team at Information Exchange Group interviewed Scott Mcgowan, Director, Global ...
Monday, 07 September 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FOR Q2' 16 DELIVERY CLOSED US CENTS 25 LOWER COMPARED TO Q4' 15
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined $0.73 per MT (-1.68%) month over month to US$ 42.65 per mt. The sw ...
|
|
|
Showing 2826 to 2830 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
