We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 11 September 15
SHIPPING MARKETS SHOW MIXED EMOTIONS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has managed to show marginal improvements over the past few days, with the Capesize segment faring better than smaller dry bulk ...
Friday, 11 September 15
U.S'S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION WAS ALMOST FLAT PAST WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 18.6 million shor ...
Thursday, 10 September 15
U.S. H1' 15 STEAM COAL EXPORTS FELL BY 21 PER CENT Y-Y: EIA
Coal Trade
Slower growth in world coal demand, lower international coal prices, and higher coal output in other coal-exporting countries have all ...
Thursday, 10 September 15
INDONESIAN COAL BENCHMARK PRICE HITS A NEW LOW OF $58.21 PER TON
COALspot.com - The Director General of Mineral and Coal of Indonesia once a again revised down Indonesian coal benchmark price to US$ 58.21 per MT ...
Thursday, 10 September 15
IF NOT NOW, WHEN? - GIANNIS ANDRITSOPOULOS
Our industry is well known to be cyclical with some cycles lasting longer than others. Despite the fact that these shifts in the behavior of the fr ...
|
|
|
Showing 2821 to 2825 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Planning Commission, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
|
| |
| |
|