We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 04 September 15
GOVERNORS WILL HAVE THE POWER TO REVOKE MINERS' PERMITS: ENERGY MINISTRY - JG
Starting Oct. 1, Indonesia's governors will lawfully become "executors" in revoking the licenses of miners that fail to secure a &quo ...
Thursday, 03 September 15
MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF INDONESIA TO REVISE HBA METHODOLOGY
COALspot.com: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) in process to revise Indonesian Coal Price Reference (HBA) and expected to complete b ...
Thursday, 03 September 15
THE CHINESE STOCK MARKET AND THE CHINESE ECONOMY CONTINUE TO SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT TRADING - INTERMODAL
The last week of the summer season saw the BDI dipping further on the back of another significant drop in rates for Capes, which brought the market ...
Wednesday, 02 September 15
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 13.46 MMT OF COAL IN JULY; UP 0.66 PER CENT M-O-M
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped $1.224 billi ...
Wednesday, 02 September 15
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE ILIOPOULOS
In the beginning of the summer period SnP activity was firm with numerous buyers, coming mainly from Greece and the Far East, inspecting ships and ...
|
|
|
Showing 2836 to 2840 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- The University of Queensland
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|