We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 17 September 15
LOW DEMAND PUSH COAL SWAP DOWN
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and gain week over week.
The 4Q swap declined $ 1.77 (-4.17%) ...
Thursday, 17 September 15
MARKET INSIGHT - KONSTANTINOS KONTOMICHIS
Having experienced, as it was much anticipated, a poor 1st half combined with negative forecasts, summer, in sharp contrast, proved to be more hope ...
Wednesday, 16 September 15
SLOWER GROWTH IN WORLD COAL DEMAND AND LOWER INTERNATIONAL COAL PRICES LED A DECLINE IN INDONESIAN COAL PRODUCTION
COALspot.com: Slower growth in world coal demand particularly China and lower international coal prices have led to a decline in Indonesian coal pr ...
Wednesday, 16 September 15
HIGHER TAXES COULD LEAD GREEK SHIP OWNERS OUT OF THE COUNTRY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
A potential taxation overhaul of the shipping industry in Hellas, which could see the loss of particular tax benefits for ship owners, could lead t ...
Tuesday, 15 September 15
WORLD SEABORNE TRADE: ENTERING INTO A ROLE REVERSAL? - CLARKSONS
Over the past decade, world seaborne trade growth has been dominated by dry bulk and container trade. However, developments in the global economy t ...
|
|
|
Showing 2811 to 2815 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Australian Coal Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- White Energy Company Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
