We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 October 15
RUSSIA'S CARBO ONE COAL SALES TO HIT 50 MLN T/YR - JACQUELINE HOLMES
COALspot.com: Russia's Carbo One has become one of the world's leading physical coal traders with an annual volume approaching 50 million t ...
Wednesday, 21 October 15
MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
In today’s dry bulk market, both freight rates and asset prices are creating mixed feelings to seasoned ship owners, who tend to instinctivel ...
Wednesday, 21 October 15
INDONESIAN COAL MINER BUKIT ASAM POSTS POSITIVE PERFORMANCE DURING FIRST THREE QUARTERS OF 2015
COALspot.com: Indonesian publicly listed and state controlled coal miner PT. Bukit Asam has announced that, the company’s coal sales up 8 per ...
Wednesday, 21 October 15
LOWER DEMAND HIT Q1' 16 INDONESIA COAL SWAPS
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q4 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q4 swap declined $ 1.88 (-4.71%) per t ...
Tuesday, 20 October 15
SHIPBROKER SEES CAPESIZE RATES EASILY REACHING $25,000/DAY BY YEAR-END : NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The future course of the dry bulk market has been troubling market participants for quite some time now, as the “elusive” freight rate ...
|
|
|
Showing 2756 to 2760 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Australian Coal Association
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
|
| |
| |
|
