We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 26 October 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS CLOSE DOWN 4.3% AS DEMAND CONCERNS WEIGH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down just US$ 1.48 (3.02 %) per ton month over month.
A commodity sw ...
Sunday, 25 October 15
ANOTHER DISAPPOINTING WEEK FOR PANAMAX; INDEX FELL 5.4 PERCENT W-W
COALspot.com: The BDI was slightly up by 2.65 pct closing at 774 points mainly because of Cape index which was up by 10.85 pct closing at 1461 poin ...
Sunday, 25 October 15
DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS ARE LOOKING TO CHINA'S POLICIES FOR CUES ON FUTURE MARKET DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
China’s hard or softer landing is a thing which has troubled dry bulk shipping for a couple of years now, as owners have been hit by the coun ...
Friday, 23 October 15
WILL INDIAN DOMESTIC COAL PRICES BE ABLE TO COMPETE IMPORTED COAL PRICES IF THE CURRENT TREND CONTINUES?
COALspot.com: The Most of the Indian end-users are waiting for last minute purchase to enjoy every drop in price. Coal procurement managers are als ...
Friday, 23 October 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. FOR THE WEEK ENDING OCTOBER 17 DECLINED FOR THE SECOND STRAIGHT WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 16.6 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2751 to 2755 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Australian Coal Association
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
|
| |
| |
|
