We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 29 October 15
Q2' 16 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED US$ 37.40 PER TON; DECLINED 5.56 PER CENT M-M
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q4 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q4 swap declined $ 2.13 (-5.34%) per t ...
Wednesday, 28 October 15
Q2'16 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP SEES FURTHER DECLINES
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q4' 2015 gained week over week and declined month over month.
The Q4 swap was d ...
Wednesday, 28 October 15
BDI INCREASE TOOK PLACE SOLELY ON THE BACK OF CAPESIZE PERFORMANCE, BUT........ - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market closed off the week noting a small improvement which nonetheless failed to lift sentiment, not only because ...
Tuesday, 27 October 15
Q1'16 API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP DECLINE 6 PER CENT M-M
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q4’ 2015 delivery decreased $2 per ton (4.66%) month over month to US$ 40.93 per ton. The swa ...
Monday, 26 October 15
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 10.5 PER CENT LESS COAL IN SEPTEMBER, COMPARED TO AUGUST LOADING
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped $1.161 billi ...
|
|
|
Showing 2746 to 2750 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
|
| |
| |
|
