We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 18 March 16
OUTLOOK ON GLOBAL SHIPPING SECTOR TURNS NEGATIVE AS SUPPLY-DEMAND GAP WIDENS AND EBITDA DECLINES - MOODY'S
Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) has changed its outlook on the global shipping sector to negative as it expects supply growth to ou ...
Friday, 18 March 16
DRY BULK MARKET HAS LITTLE TO LOOK FORWARD TO FROM CHINA AT THE MOMENT - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market’s rebound is long overdue, but when it comes, it won’t be because of China’s strong demand for commodities, o ...
Friday, 18 March 16
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES SLIGHTLY DECREASED THIS WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 12.5 million shor ...
Thursday, 17 March 16
THE PANAMAX MARKET SEEMS TO BE A BIT TOPPISH THIS WEEK - FEARNLEYS
Cape
There are challenging days with rates or less unchanged from last week; West Australia to China still below US$ 3 pmt, and Tuarao to China i ...
Wednesday, 16 March 16
OIL SUPPLY OUTPACES DEMAND ON ANY GIVEN DAY, AND BILLIONS OF BARRELS OF OIL ARE BEING STORED RATHER THAN CONSUMED - CHRISTOPHER
Oil producers have turned to the concept of limiting their output to January levels as a certain form of action to boost prices that have fallen mo ...
|
|
|
Showing 2516 to 2520 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
