We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 12 April 16
NO FURTHER SIGNIFICANT COAL PRICE DECLINES IN THE FUTURE - FITCH
COALspot.com: Fitch does not expect further significant coal price declines because producers sector-wide are suffering losses while China and Indo ...
Monday, 11 April 16
ON THE TIGHTROPE, IT CAN BE HARD TO KEEP YOUR BALANCE.... - CLARKSONS
Today’s headlines often point towards the impact of the demand side on the state of health of the shipping markets. But despite the fact that ...
Monday, 11 April 16
WEEKLY CS (I) COAL INDEX FOR 5700 GAR COAL UP 0.03 CENTS, OR ABOUT 0.06 PERCENT, TO $48.21 A TON
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin fell 0.15 percent week over week to averaging $38.82 per ton on this past Friday, ac ...
Monday, 11 April 16
COAL IS NOT THE ENEMY TO FIGHT - ANDREA CLAVARINO, ASSOCARBONI
COALspot.com: “Coal is not the enemy to fight and electricity production from coal has an environmental impact in its lifecycle similar to na ...
Monday, 11 April 16
FORTY INDIAN COAL IMPORTERS UNDER THE DRI SCANNER FOR OVER-INVOICING : HINDU BUSINESS LINE
The Finance Ministry and the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) of India are said to have stepped up investigations into the alleged over-in ...
|
|
|
Showing 2481 to 2485 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Planning Commission, India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- The University of Queensland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
