We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 18 April 16
INDONESIAN 5000 GAR COAL INDEX DECLINE 1.43 PERCENT WEEK OVER WEEK - CS (I) COAL INDEX
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin fell 1.43 percent week over week to averaging $38.65 per ton on this past Friday, ac ...
Monday, 18 April 16
SOUTH KOREA STATE-OWNED UTILITY KOMIPO INVITES COAL BIDS FOR BORYEONG POWER PLANT
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a new tender for 70,000 Metric Tons of 4,600 kcal/kg NAR coal for ...
Monday, 18 April 16
SOUTH AFRICA RB1 COAL HAS LOST GROUND IN INDIA; RB2 MAY LOSE GRIP IF THE PRICE CROSSES US$ 50 A TON - TRADERS
COALspot.com: Indian coal consumers preferred to buy South Africa RB2 coal instead of RB1 coal recent months due to RB2's low CFR price level. ...
Monday, 18 April 16
CAPESIZE INDEX ROSE 44.66 PER CENT WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities continued to rose this week.
The freight market was ...
Friday, 15 April 16
PANAMAX MARKET CONTINUES TO FIRM - FEARNLEYS
Cape
It has been a positive freight market for the past few weeks, however, this week the market is taking a small breather, says Fearnleys in it ...
|
|
|
Showing 2471 to 2475 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Australian Coal Association
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PTC India Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
