We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 07 April 16
PANAMAX RATES ARE FIRMING IN BOTH HEMISHEPHERES - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
With a great volume our of west Australia, rates were finally moving to upper 3's. and stabilizing towards the middle of the week in ...
Thursday, 07 April 16
BIMCO AND GIIGNL PUBLISH A GROUNDBREAKING VOYAGE CHARTER PARTY FOR LNG TRADE
BIMCO and the International Group of Liquefied Natural Gas Importers (GIIGNL) have today jointly issued the first definitive voyage charter party & ...
Wednesday, 06 April 16
HOW LONG SHIPPING CRISIS WILL BE; WHEN SHOULD OWNERS EXPECT THE BULK CARRIERS TO BECOME PROFITABLE? - INTERMODAL
It is the consensus that dry bulk shipping has been in a crisis for quite some time now. Bulk carrier values are at historical low levels, therefor ...
Tuesday, 05 April 16
DRY BULK REVISITS 1980S LOWS AND FACES UNCERTAIN LONGER TERM OUTLOOK - MSI | HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
With the market near bottom, attention is turning to the length of the downturn, the effect on asset values and the impact of broader demand side c ...
Monday, 04 April 16
THE LOADING, AND SUBSEQUENT DISCHARGE, OF UNSAFE NICKEL ORE - ALL TIME TO 'COUNT' - THE STANDARD CLUB
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In a recent, published, London arbitration award the English tribunal has held that all time lost as a result of loading, ...
|
|
|
Showing 2491 to 2495 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The University of Queensland
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
