We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 08 June 16
THE DRY BULK MARKET KEPT MOVING SIDEWAYS LAST WEEK; SECOND HAND PURCHASES MOVING NORTH - INTERMODAL
Once again its Posidonia time and the biannual exhibition takes place during a very warm June here in Athens, as if the performance of the dry bulk ...
Tuesday, 07 June 16
CS COAL INDEX ROSE FOR SECOND STRAIGHT WEEK
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin was up 0.38 percent week over week to averaging $39.16 per ton this past week, shows ...
Monday, 06 June 16
BDI GAINED ON A STRONGER DEMAND FOR CAPESIZE SHIPS
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose this past week on a stronger demand for Capesize ves ...
Friday, 03 June 16
DRY BULK VESSEL DELIVERIES COULD BE LESS THAN 50 MILLION DWT IN 2016, AS OWNERS DELAY OR CANCEL NEWBUILDING ORDERS
The dry bulk market has been caught between a rock and a hard place over the course of the past couple of years, as on one hand demand has plunged, ...
Friday, 03 June 16
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION SLIDES 1.3% - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 11.5 million short tons (mm ...
|
|
|
Showing 2406 to 2410 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Australian Coal Association
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PTC India Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
