We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 15 June 16
THE DRY BULK PRICES CORRECTED UPWARDS ROUGHLY 15% - KONSTANTINOS KONTOMICHIS
Once more, the international shipping community turned its attention to Greece and more specifically to Attica that hosted Posidonia, the biggest m ...
Tuesday, 14 June 16
CS COAL INDICES ROSE UP FOR A THIRD STRAIGHT WEEK; 4200 GAR COAL UP 0.73%
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin was up 0.54 percent week over week to averaging $39.37 per ton this past week, shows ...
Monday, 13 June 16
DEMAND FOR DRY BULK COMMODITIES COULD PROVIDE FUTURE BOOST FOR SHIP OWNERS - HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
When it comes to the dry bulk market, shipowners these days are looking for news in any shape or form they can find them. However, as the discussio ...
Monday, 13 June 16
ONSHORE SHALE: WORTH KEEPING IN THE SHIPPING SPOTLIGHT CLARKSONS
Generally, shipping industry watchers spend much of their time monitoring events out to sea: how fleets are evolving, trade volumes growing and fre ...
Monday, 13 June 16
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 5.03% MORE COAL IN MAY; AVERAGE SELLING PRICE DECLINED 2.08% FROM APRIL
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $AU 1.162bill ...
|
|
|
Showing 2396 to 2400 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
