We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 30 May 16
BCI ENDING AT 830 POINTS, DOWN 4.6 PER CENT W/W
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities decline this week. The freight market was weak this past ...
Friday, 27 May 16
PET-COKE IMPORTS TO FACE PRESSURE IN INDIA
COALspot.com: An Indian environmental activist moved the National Green Tribunal seeking ban on the use of all forms of petroleum coke, also called ...
Friday, 27 May 16
US COAL PRODUCTION ROSE 2.9% WOW, ACCORDING TO EIA
COALspot.com – U.S the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 11.7 million short tons (mm ...
Thursday, 26 May 16
GIANT ORE CARRIERS SET TO PLAY A BIGGER ROLE IN THE GLOBAL SHIPPING FLEET: CHINA EMBRACES VALEMAXES - RICHARD SCOTT
Another phase of the giant ships era is approaching. Chinese shipowners placed orders recently for 30 huge ‘valemax’ ore carriers. Thes ...
Wednesday, 25 May 16
MEDIATION AS A WAY TO RESOLVE DISPUTES IN THE SHIPPING INDUSTRY - LANA JACOBS
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The shipping market is currently experiencing a serious recession with the Baltic Dry Index and Baltic Capesize Index bot ...
|
|
|
Showing 2416 to 2420 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Australian Coal Association
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
