We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 27 June 16
THE BDI UP 3.75 PERCENT ; BCI FELL 1.51% WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose this past week. The BDI was up 3.75 percent from las ...
Monday, 27 June 16
INDONESIA BANS (AGAIN) SHIPS SAILING TO THE PHILIPPINES FROM INDONESIA
COALspot.com: The Indonesian Transport Ministry strictly prohibited harbour masters issuing permits to all Indonesian-flagged vessels bound for the ...
Friday, 24 June 16
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION UP MARGINALLY
COALspot.com – U.S, world’s one of the largest coal producers has produced approximately totalled an estimated 13.4 million short tons ...
Wednesday, 22 June 16
SMALL RISE IN SHIPPING CONFIDENCE - MOORE STEPHENS
In May 2016, the average confidence level expressed by respondents in the markets in which they operate was 5.1 on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high). ...
Wednesday, 22 June 16
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - NASSOS SOULAKIS
Stagnation- With the BDI stuck in the low 600 points for almost a month now, if we had to choose a word to describe the state of the Dry Bulk freig ...
|
|
|
Showing 2386 to 2390 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Planning Commission, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
