We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 14 July 16
SHIPPING'S HALF YEAR REPORT - 'MUST DO BETTER' - CLARKSONS
It’s the time of year, with the school holidays and end of term approaching, that many pupils will nervously take home their school reports t ...
Wednesday, 13 July 16
EIA FORECASTS U.S. COAL EXPORTS TO DECLINE BY 15 MMST IN 2016 AND BY 4 MMST IN 2017
COALspot.com: U.S. coal production in June was 57 million short tons (MMst), a 6 MMst (13%) increase from May and 9 MMst (14%) lower than in June 2 ...
Wednesday, 13 July 16
2015 VS. 2016; THE DRY BULK DEMOLITION DERBY - JOHN N. COTZIAS
In the first half of the year 373 Bulkers and General Cargo ships were scrapped representing 23.8mil tons of dwt carrying capacity.
Comparing ...
Tuesday, 12 July 16
DUE TO LONG HOLIDAYS, CS COAL INDICES HELD AT THE SAME LEVEL OF THE PREVIOUS WEEK
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin was flat week over week to averaging $39.98 per ton this past week.
Due to the ...
Monday, 11 July 16
COAL MARKETS SAW IMPROVED PRICES IN H1 2016 - SGX'S COMMODITIES MID-YEAR REFLECTION
COALspot.com: Coal
Coal markets saw improved prices in H1 2016 with the benchmark coking coal and thermal coal spot prices rising 18% and 25%, re ...
|
|
|
Showing 2361 to 2365 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PTC India Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
|
| |
| |
|
