We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 11 July 16
THE MAIN SEA FREIGHT INDEX, BDI ROSE FURTHER ON 8 JULY DUE TO STRONG DEMAND FOR PANAMAX SHIPS
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose this past week. The BDI was up 3.84 percent from las ...
Monday, 11 July 16
DRY BULK MARKET: UP TO 30 MILLION DWT OF OLDER BULKERS WILL NEED TO BE SCRAPPED BY END OF 2017 FOR MARKET TO FIND BALANCE
Tonnage oversupply in the dry bulk market is more than evident, as newbuildings have been hitting the water faster than owners can scrap their olde ...
Friday, 08 July 16
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT UP 3% TO 14.1 MMST - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S, world’s second largest coal producers has produced approximately totalled an estimated 14.1 million short tons (mms ...
Thursday, 07 July 16
PANAMAX : THE TENDENCY FROM LAST WEEK CONTINUES WITH A CONSIDERABLY STRONGER SENTIMENT ALL ACROSS THE BLOCK - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
Rates have been holding at steady levels over the last weeks but towards end of this period they are becoming under more pressure as gen ...
Thursday, 07 July 16
CONSOLIDATION TO RULE OVER SHIPPING, AS EXECUTIVES SEEK INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN CHINA, INDIA AND EUROPE SAYS NORTON ROSE SURVEY
The transport sector is looking to Asia Pacific as the key market for investment over the next five years, according to the seventh The way ahead T ...
|
|
|
Showing 2366 to 2370 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
