We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 25 July 16
STRONG BUYER DEMAND PUSHING UP INDONESIAN THERMAL COAL INDICES
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin rose 0.73 percent week over week to averaging $40.83 per ton this past week, shows C ...
Monday, 25 July 16
THE BDI FELL ON WEAKER RATES FOR CAPESIZE & PANAMAX VESSELS
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities slide slightly as Cape and Panamax segments ending in neg ...
Friday, 22 July 16
U.S COAL OUTPUT ROSE 17.2% WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S, world’s second largest coal producers has produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.1 million short tons (mms ...
Thursday, 21 July 16
WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU DON'T GET PAID - SHIPOWNERS CLUB
Present market conditions have led to an increase in claims related to unpaid hire. To recover unpaid hire, Owners need to fully understand who the ...
Thursday, 21 July 16
CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS: WHAT GOES IN TO CALCULATING QUANTUM? - HILL DICKINSON
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The Commercial Court recently delivered its judgment in an important case (Connect Shipping Inc and Machrimar Management ...
|
|
|
Showing 2351 to 2355 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
