We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 08 August 16
THE TURKISH GOVERNMENT HAS IMPOSED A $15 A TON DUTY ON POWER PLANT COAL IMPORTS - MEDIA
COALspot.com: The Turkish government has imposed a US$15 per ton duty on thermal coal imports for use in its power sector.
According to media ...
Monday, 08 August 16
THE BALTIC EXCHANGE, TRACKING RATES FOR SHIPS CARRYING DRY BULK COMMODITIES SLIDE SLIGHTLY
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities slide slightly as Panamax and Supramax segments ending in ...
Monday, 08 August 16
ARE EXPENSES INCURRED DURING NEGOTIATION OF A PIRATE RANSOM RECOVERABLE IN GENERAL AVERAGE? - CLYDE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Facts
The laden chemical tanker LONGCHAMP was transiting the Gulf of Aden on passage to Vietnam. The ship was subject t ...
Saturday, 06 August 16
DRY BULK SHIPPING CHARTER RATES TO RISE ON UNEXPECTED DEMAND GROWTH - DREWRY
Increasing trade and contracting supply will support a recovery in charter rates on major dry bulk shipping routes, with the prospect of China impo ...
Friday, 05 August 16
WEEKLY U.S. COAL OUTPUT TOTALED AN ESTIMATED 16.1 MMST IN THE WEEK ENDED JULY 30 - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers has produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.1 million short tons ...
|
|
|
Showing 2331 to 2335 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- The University of Queensland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
|
| |
| |
|
