We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 05 August 16
CAPESIZE : RATES ARE REMAINING AT DEPRESSING LEVELS DUE TO LACK OF FRESH CARGOES - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Last week has been one of the slowest for some time with rates under pressure in most areas.
In its latest weekly report, shipbroke ...
Thursday, 04 August 16
INDONESIAN COAL PRICES ARE STARTING TO ZOOM HIGHER; HBA ROSE 10.13% TO US$ 58.37 PER TON
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal benchmark price hits to its highest level since August 2015.
The Director General of Mineral and Coa ...
Thursday, 04 August 16
BREXIT: IMPLICATIONS FOR GLOBAL SHIPPING AND SEA TRADE - EVERSHEDS
The buzzword for the post-Brexit landscape both in Europe and further afield is ‘uncertainty’. No-one really knows the long term effect ...
Wednesday, 03 August 16
RECAAP INFORMATION SHARING CENTRE ISSUES SPECIAL REPORT ON THE ABDUCTING OF CREW FROM SHIPS IN WATERS OFF EASTERN SABAH AND SOUTHERN PHILIPPINES - THE STANDARD CLUB
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the light of three incidents where the crew of tug boats were abducted in the waters off Eastern Sabah and Southern Ph ...
Wednesday, 03 August 16
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - EVA TZIMA
The Good…
Demand. Amidst all the unprecedented geopolitical turmoil and shifts in the likes of Brexit, the IMF lowered last month its glob ...
|
|
|
Showing 2336 to 2340 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The University of Queensland
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- White Energy Company Limited
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Planning Commission, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
