We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 15 August 16
THE SPOT FREIGHT MARKET STRENGTHEN OVER THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose as Cape and Panamax segments ending in a positive no ...
Friday, 12 August 16
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT ENDING AUGUST 6 FELL SLIGHTLY
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.9 million short ton ...
Thursday, 11 August 16
CAPESIZE THE PACIFIC SIDE IS LOOKING MORE POSITIVE, DRIVEN BY AUSTRALIAN IRON ORE - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Rates continue to be under pressure with index ending up with 639 points and average TC value at USD6,680, said Fearnleys. Fearnleys A/S ...
Thursday, 11 August 16
EIA ESTIMATES THE DELIVERED COAL PRICE TO U.S. ELECTRIC UTILITIES IN 2017 AVERAGED $2.24/MMBTU; $0.05/MMBTU HIGHER THAN 2016 ESTIMATES
Coal Supply
U.S. coal production in July was 65 million short tons (MMst), an 8 MMst (14%) increase from the previous month but 11 MMst (15%) low ...
Wednesday, 10 August 16
THE DRY BULK MARKET KEPT SOFTENING LAST WEEK; WE CAN SEE MUCH HEALTHIER NUMBERS STARTING SEPTEMBER
The Dry Bulk market kept softening last week as we have now started going through the traditionally quieter days of the summer season peak period, ...
|
|
|
Showing 2321 to 2325 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The University of Queensland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
