We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 13 October 22
OPEC DOWNGRADES CRUDE OIL DEMAND, AS WORLD ECONOMY ENTERS SLOWDOWN
Crude Oil Price Movements
The OPEC Reference Basket (ORB) declined m-o-m by $6.58 in September, or 6.5%, to average $95.32/b. Pressure from equ ...
Wednesday, 12 October 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Sale and Purchase activity during the first three quarters of 2022 has been remarkable.
Focusing only on Tankers and Bulkers, such v ...
Monday, 10 October 22
ENERGY TRANSITION BOOSTS GLOBAL LONG-TERM DEMAND FOR METALS - FITCH RATINGS
The energy transition will significantly increase demand for metals used in manufacturing of electric vehicles (EVs) and renewable power generation ...
Monday, 10 October 22
GLOBAL CEOS EXPECT IMPENDING RECESSION TO BE 'SHORT AND SHARP,' POLL SHOWS - CNBC
Global CEOs are anticipating a recession in the next 12 months, according to a new survey by professional services firm KPMG, which said more than ...
Thursday, 06 October 22
AUSTRALIA’S RESOURCES REVENUE TO HIT RECORD AMID UKRAINE CONFLICT - REUTERS
Australian resources and energy export earnings are forecast to jump 7% to a record A$450 billion ($290 billion) this fiscal year, bolstered by soa ...
|
|
|
Showing 211 to 215 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- White Energy Company Limited
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The University of Queensland
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PTC India Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Planning Commission, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
|
| |
| |
|
