We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 26 December 16
DO THE DERIVATIVES MARKETS MAKE COAL PRICES MORE VOLATILE? 59.21% SAY YES, POLL
COALspot.com: The substantial increase or decrease in coal prices within a short period of time has been supported by a number of fundamental drive ...
Friday, 23 December 16
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION TOTALED 711.1 MMST; DOWN 18.5% Y/Y - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.7 million short ton ...
Thursday, 22 December 16
INDONESIA LACK OF EXPORT TO INDIA THIS WEEK - FERNLEYS
Supramax
While the Atlantic is keeping up with rates, the Pacific has been weaker says Astrup Fernley.
According to Astrup Fernley, backhaul ...
Wednesday, 21 December 16
THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN OW BUNKERS - WHEN A SALE OF GOODS IS NOT A SALE OF GOODS - LEON ALEXANDER, CLYDE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In May 2016 the Supreme Court of England & Wales gave judgment in an OW Bunkers test case entitled "Res Cogitans ...
Wednesday, 21 December 16
CLEANING THE OCEANS FROM PLASTIC - SOPHIE COTZIAS
2016 is coming to a close and it finds us in preparation for the 2017 enforcement of the Ballast Water Treatment Systems. We naturally are in thoug ...
|
|
|
Showing 2171 to 2175 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parliament of New Zealand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- White Energy Company Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
