We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 December 16
INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL DISMISSED CHURCHILL MINING'S DAMAGES CLAIM AGAINST REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
The Directors of Churchill Mining plc advise that, the ICSID Tribunal (“Tribunal”) granted Indonesia’s application to dismiss the ...
Wednesday, 14 December 16
20/20 VISION! - JOHN N. COTZIAS
2020; A year that could be changing shipping. In early November, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) announced that it would set a 0.5% s ...
Tuesday, 13 December 16
THE FREIGHT MARKET MAY WELL BE SHOWING SIGNS OF HEADING FOR ITS DOWNWARD CORRECTIVE PHASE - ALLIED
2016 has been a tough market for dry bulkers and through these difficult earnings, we have seen some of the lowest prices being noted historically ...
Tuesday, 13 December 16
COAL DEMAND GROWTH TO STALL AS APPETITE WANES, ACCORDING TO IEA
Growth in global coal demand will stall over the next five years as the appetite for the fuel wanes and other energy sources gain ground, according ...
Monday, 12 December 16
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION TOTALS 16.3 MMST, UP 7.4% - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.3 million short ton ...
|
|
|
Showing 2181 to 2185 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
|
| |
| |
|
