We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 25 September 17
U.S WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT DROPS FOR THE FOURTH WEEK IN A ROW, EIA DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.5 million short ton ...
Wednesday, 20 September 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
An undoubtedly interesting market lately is the newbuilding market, in which we are witnessing numerous orders across all sectors and sizes. At the ...
Monday, 18 September 17
COAL PRICES WERE RELATIVELY UNCHANGED WEEK OVER WEEK - ANZ
COALspot.com: Coal prices were relatively unchanged, with most interest remaining in the thermal coal market said Daniel Hynes. However, falling st ...
Monday, 18 September 17
PROSPECTS ARE NOT SO CLEAR CUT FOR COAL - CLARKSONS
Prospects are not so clear-cut for coal. According to Clarksons, coal has been a key energy source since the Industrial Revolution and in 2016, ste ...
Friday, 15 September 17
U.S WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT DROPS FOR THE THIRD WEEK IN A ROW, EIA DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.7 million short ton ...
|
|
|
Showing 1936 to 1940 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
