We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 03 October 17
RIO TINTO COMPLETES FIRST FULLY AUTONOMOUS RAIL JOURNEY IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Rio Tinto has successfully completed the first fully autonomous rail journey at its iron ore operations in the Pilbara region of Western Australia ...
Tuesday, 03 October 17
ALLIED MARKET ANALYSIS
It seems as though the future of the oil trade was once again put into the spotlight, as the Asia Pacific Petroleum Conference took place last week ...
Friday, 29 September 17
U.S WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT DROPS FOR THE FIFTH WEEK IN A ROW, EIA DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 14.7 million short ...
Thursday, 28 September 17
SUPRAMAX: S.CHINA TRIP TO INDIA HAS BEEN FIXED AT AROUND US$ 11000 - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
The hot market seen the last weeks in the Pacific has softened as the Golden week holiday in China approaches and the October shipments ...
Thursday, 28 September 17
THE 'UNREASONABLE' COST OF CASUALTY REPAIRS: ASSOCIATION OF AVERAGE ADJUSTERS CHAIRMAN DETAILS CLAIMS DILEMMAS
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The ‘unreasonable’ cost of casualty repairs: Association of Average Adjusters chairman details claims dilemma ...
|
|
|
Showing 1926 to 1930 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
