We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 14 September 17
THE FIRM COAL TRADE IS SUPPORTING SUPRAS; FIXING AROUND LOW $13000 WITH DELIVERY THAILAND - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
This week has brought Supras firm rates and numerous orders. Scrap orders from Cont to Med still pay $11000 and Fertilizer from Baltic t ...
Thursday, 14 September 17
KOMIPO INVITED BIDS FOR 5700 NAR BITUMINOUS COAL FOR BORYEONG POWER PLANT; 390K MT FOR NOV LOADING
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an another new tender for 390,000 Metric Tons of Bituminous coal ...
Wednesday, 13 September 17
U.S. COAL EXPORTS FOR THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF 2017 WERE 55% HIGHER COMPARED TO THE SAME PERIOD IN 2016 - EIA
COALspot.com: EIA expects the share of U.S. total utility-scale electricity generation from natural gas to fall from an average of 34% in 2016 to a ...
Wednesday, 13 September 17
SOME THOUGHTS ON NORTH KOREA, US & CHINA - THEODORE NTALAKOS
The trade volume between North Korea and China is more than $5 billion per year. 83% of North Korea's exports end up in China; similarly, about ...
Tuesday, 12 September 17
NEWCASTLE FOB PRICES ROSE STRONGLY AND ARE NOW THREATENING TO BREAK THROUGH US$100/T - DANIEL HYNES
COALspot.com: The rise in crude oil market supported further gains in thermal coal, says Daniel Hynes Senior Commodity Strategist at ANZ.
Acco ...
|
|
|
Showing 1941 to 1945 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PTC India Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
|
| |
| |
|