We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 09 October 17
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE HITS NEW HIGH FOR 2017
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal benchmark price surges 2.13% in October month over month, the latest ministerial decree showed.
The benchmark pr ...
Monday, 09 October 17
INDIA'S COAL IMPORTS UP 10% IN SEPT AS POWER PLANTS FACE FUEL SHORTAGE - PTI
Coal imports rose by 9.5 per cent to 18.33 million tonnes (MT) in September, after having registered year-on-year decline for five months in a row, ...
Friday, 06 October 17
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT HAS REBOUNDED AFTER DECLINING 5 WEEKS IN A ROW
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.3 million short tons ...
Wednesday, 04 October 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE ILIOPOULOS
During the past couple of months the dry bulk market has displayed particularly strong momentum and we have been witnessing steady appetite and act ...
Tuesday, 03 October 17
VIETNAM'S COAL-FIRED THERMAL POWER DEPENDENT ON CHINA - VIETNAMNET BRIDGE
A report from the Green Innovation and Development Centre (GreenID) showed that, as of the end of last year, of 27 coal-fired thermopower plants, 1 ...
|
|
|
Showing 1921 to 1925 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
|
| |
| |
|
