We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 October 17
SULPHUR 2020: COMING, READY OR NOT - ALIBRA SHIPPING
Some 70% of shipping companies surveyed say they do not believe the industry is ready for IMO’s 2020 deadline, when a global limit of 0.5% su ...
Tuesday, 17 October 17
U.S RECORD EXPORTS OIL TO EAST HAS HELPED THE TANKER TRADE - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
There was a flood of fresh news this week which clouded the overall prospects of the crude oil market. Just one week prior Saudi Arabia and Russia, ...
Monday, 16 October 17
INDONESIA TO INDIA COAL FREIGHT RATES STAY FIRM
COALspot.com: The daily average earnings for Supramax, for the route Indonesia to India passing through Singapore has stayed firm, week over week, ...
Friday, 13 October 17
INDIKA ENERGY SIGNS SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENTS FOR AN ADDITIONAL 45% STAKE IN KIDECO
PT Indika Energy Tbk. and its wholly-owned subsidiary PT Indika Inti Corpindo (collectively, “Indika Energy”) has entered into separate ...
Friday, 13 October 17
THE SHORT-TERM OUTLOOK FOR THE PANAMAX MARKET REMAIN POSITIVE - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
The market has picked up strongly since last week with the Chinese holidays. In the Pacific rates are increasing with some strong number ...
|
|
|
Showing 1911 to 1915 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Australian Coal Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The University of Queensland
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
