We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 07 November 17
MECHEL SIGNED LONG-TERM COAL SUPPLY CONTRACT WITH ITOCHU CORPORATION
Mechel PAO a leading Russian mining and metals company, reports signing a framework agreement with a major Japanese universal trading company Itoch ...
Tuesday, 07 November 17
DRY BULK SHIPPING: TAKE GOOD CARE OF THE RECOVERY SAYS PETER SAND
Demand:
Even without much support from Brazilian iron ore exports during August, capesize rates went from $10,000 to $17,000 per day. In Septembe ...
Tuesday, 07 November 17
COAL MARKETS WERE RELATIVELY BUOYANT - DANIEL HYNES
Coal markets were relatively buoyant. Metallurgical coal prices were supported by the stronger steel and iron ore prices, says Daniel Hynes, Senior ...
Tuesday, 07 November 17
PROSPERITY AND WINTER WARMTH REMAIN PARAMOUNT IN CHINA - JEFFREY LANDSBERG
Chinese officials announced recently that 580 gigawatts of coal-derived electricity generation capacity has completed ultra-low emissions reform as ...
Monday, 06 November 17
COAL SHORTAGE HURTS INDIA'S HINDALCO AND VEDANTA SAYS BUSINESS STANDARD
Aluminium smelter operations of Vedanta and Hindalco are at risk of turning unviable due to a coal crunch.
According to Business Standard an I ...
|
|
|
Showing 1891 to 1895 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
|
| |
| |
|