We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 15 January 18
QUEENSLAND SHIPPED 210.8 MT OF COAL IN 2017, DOWN 5% YOY QUEENSLAND RESOURCES COUNCIL
Queensland's coal exports over the 12 months reached 210.8 mt which is down 10 mt or 5 per cent from the previous year’s record of 220.8 ...
Thursday, 11 January 18
SUPRAMAX: INDO TO CHINA COAL ROUNDS FIXING AT AROUND $10K - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
USG rates improved both for backhaul and fronthaul, Ultras from USG to Japan receiving around $26k daily while supras 1-2k less for same ...
Wednesday, 10 January 18
2018: IT IS PROJECTED, THE SHIPBUILDERS WILL DELIVER FOUR HUNDRED FORTY NEW VESSELS IN 2018
Headlines from IMF's 2017 – World Economic Outlook:
January 2017 - “After a lacklustre outturn in 2016, economic activity is p ...
Tuesday, 09 January 18
INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT DECLARED COAL REFERENCE PRICE UP IN JANUARY
COALspot.com: the Indonesian Coal Price Reference ( HBA) rose 1.60 per cent in January 2018, the latest ministerial decree showed.
The benchma ...
Friday, 05 January 18
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT FELL 32.4% PER CENT WEEK OVER WEEK, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 10.5 million short tons ...
|
|
|
Showing 1831 to 1835 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
|
| |
| |
|
