We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 23 January 18
OIL MARKET ANALYSIS - ALLIED
Brent oil futures hit a three year high on January 16th touching around USD 70.30 before falling back down to around USD 68.60 at the Time of this ...
Friday, 19 January 18
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT WAS 13.5 MMST FOR THE WEEK ENDING JANUARY 13, EIA SAYS
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 13.5 million short tons ...
Thursday, 18 January 18
WORLD TRADE IN HARD COAL RISES BY 1.5% IN 2017 - KOHLENIMPORTEURE
Press Release: World Trade in Hard Coal Rises by 1.5% in 2017. German Steam Coal Imports Plummet by 15% in 2017 – in Contrast to Other Sector ...
Wednesday, 17 January 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As we are now well into the first month of 2018, the mood across the entire offshore industry undeniably remains rather positive following the oil ...
Monday, 15 January 18
THE FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO BE FLAT TO WEAK THIS WEEK - VISTAAR
COALspot.com: The daily average earnings for Supramax, for the route Indonesia to India passing through Singapore has stayed firm, week over week, ...
|
|
|
Showing 1826 to 1830 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|