We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 01 February 18
RISING US OIL EXPORTS, MARKET DISRUPTION, BRENT-WTI SPREAD - WOOD MACKENZIE
What will US tight oil growth do to crude markets? The build-up in volumes early this decade led to a supply glut that undermined prices in 2014.
...
Wednesday, 31 January 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
Days before the celebrations of the Lunar New Year, the dry bulk market seems to be holding well, against negative predictions. Period numbers repo ...
Monday, 29 January 18
BALTIC INDEX GAINS ON STRONGER BIG VESSEL ACTIVITY
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose this past week and ending on a positive note week ov ...
Monday, 29 January 18
U.S.WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT UP 8.7% W/W - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 14.6 million short tons ...
Wednesday, 24 January 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE ILIOPOULOS
Since the beginning of the New Year we have been witnessing the BDI correcting downwards, which nonetheless seems to have no effect at ...
|
|
|
Showing 1821 to 1825 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Minerals Council of Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
