We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 February 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - KONSTANTINOS KONTOMICHIS
2017 proved to be a relatively good year with positive margins for the Dry Bulk market. Especially during the last quarter of the year everyone can ...
Tuesday, 20 February 18
INDIA: COAL IMPORT RISES BY 12 PER CENT TO 18 MILLION TONNES IN JANUARY - PTI
The country’s coal import increased by 12.4 per cent to 18.49 million tonnes (MT) in January, against 16.
44 MT in the same month of the ...
Monday, 19 February 18
JOINT INSURANCE - WHY SHOULD YOU CARE? - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is neither controversial nor new to say that co-assureds under a joint insurance policy cannot claim against each othe ...
Friday, 16 February 18
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT DOWN 4.5 PER CENT WEEK OVER WEEK, EIA DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.2 million short tons ...
Thursday, 15 February 18
INDIA: THERMAL POWER PLANTS UNDER STRESS ON RISING COAL, FREIGHT COSTS - BUSINESS STANDARD
Coal-based power plants are feeling the heat of spike in thermal grade coal prices and railway freight costs.
Prices of thermal grade coal sin ...
|
|
|
Showing 1801 to 1805 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The University of Queensland
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Planning Commission, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
