We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 02 March 18
ANGLO AMERICAN COMPLETES SALE OF ESKOM-TIED THERMAL COAL OPERATIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA
Anglo American plc (“Anglo American”) confirms completion of the sale of its Eskom-tied domestic thermal coal operations in South Afric ...
Friday, 02 March 18
MORE COAL INQUIRES FROM SOUTH AFRICA TO INDIA; SUPRAS FIXED CA $12K + BB - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Better rates in Atlantic, but not too busy market just yet.
Black Sea catched improving rates for grain cargoes, where supras to Eg ...
Friday, 02 March 18
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION DOWN 2.7 PER CENT W/E 24 FEB, EIA DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.2 million short tons ...
Wednesday, 28 February 18
INDIA: TEPID COAL TRAFFIC TO HIT VOLUME GROWTH AT PORTS TILL 2022 - PTI
Cargo growth at the country’s major ports is all set to moderate to 3-5 per cent per annum over the next five years due to the “sedate ...
Wednesday, 28 February 18
MARKET INSIGHT - LINOS KOGEVINAS
US Shale production continues to grow rapidly, hitting new records and with projections being revised upwardly at every turn. According to the Inte ...
|
|
|
Showing 1791 to 1795 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
