We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 February 18
HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF? - IEA
This month’s OMR is abbreviated to allow time for us to complete our annual five-year outlook that will be published in our report Oil 2018 o ...
Wednesday, 14 February 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - NASSOS SOULAKIS
The second month of the year is traditionally a particularly interesting one for the shipping industry as a whole and even more importantly for the ...
Monday, 12 February 18
PANAMAX: WITH LIMITED FRESH ENQUIRY IN ALL AREAS, SPOT MARKET RATES DRIFTED LOWER THROUGHOUT THE WEEK - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
A switch to the Atlantic with rates firming as charterers seemed keen to fix and tonnage was tight, prompting a recovery in rates. Trans ...
Monday, 12 February 18
WORLDWIDE: 'DEMURRAGE CLAIMS' FOR THE PURPOSES OF DOCUMENTARY TIME BARS
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
On 2 February 2018 the Commercial Court allowed an appeal from a decision of the Arbitration Tribunal in Lukoil Asia Paci ...
Saturday, 10 February 18
COAL INDIA ON PATH OF SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION GROWTH AND SUPPLY TO POWER AND NON POWER SECTOR - PIB
Supply of 371.8 MT of Coal to Power Sector and 103.1 MT Coal to Non-Power Sector Achieved in 2017-18 Till January,2018 Average Rake Loading To The ...
|
|
|
Showing 1806 to 1810 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Australian Coal Association
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The University of Queensland
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
