We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 09 March 18
THE WORLD CANNOT KEEP IGNORING THE ASIAN COAL STORY - BENJAMIN SPORTON
There were significant changes in the global energy system in 2017, including the growth in electric vehicles, the rise of renewables and the conti ...
Friday, 09 March 18
U.S. EXPORTED 97 MMST OF COAL IN 2017, A 61 PER CENT INCREASE FROM 2016 - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.1 million short tons ...
Thursday, 08 March 18
BUMA SIGNED OVER US$ 500 MILLION WORTH OF NEW CONTRACT WITH PT TANAH BUMBU RESOURCES
PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk., announced that its subsidiary, PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama ("BUMA"), has entered into mining services ...
Thursday, 08 March 18
THE ENERGY CONTRIBUTION FROM COAL-BASED POWER PLANTS IS LIKELY TO INCREASE TO 1072 BU BY 2021-22 : PIB
Government of India has set an ambitious target of 175 GW from Renewable energy sources (RES) by 2022, which comprises of 100 GW Solar, 60GW from W ...
Thursday, 08 March 18
SUPRAMAX: THE MARKET IS STILL GOING STRONG IN THE PACIFIC - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
The market is still going strong in the Pacific, with Ultra fixing high US$ 13000+375000 bb for South Africa to ECI while nickel ore run ...
|
|
|
Showing 1781 to 1785 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
|
| |
| |
|
